Monographie

En ligne (disponible) - Monographie
Eligibility and inclusiveness of long-term care : institutional frameworks in Europe: a cross-country comparison / CARRINO, Ludovico ; ORSO, Cristina Elisa.
Venice, Italy : Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Department of Economics, 2014, 73 p.

http://www.unive.it/media/allegato/DIP/Economia/Working... (09-03-2015)
Collection : Working paper ; no 28
Format de fichier : Adobe Acrobat PDF
Droits d'auteur : Cette oeuvre est protégée par un droit d'auteur. Elle ne peut être reproduite qu'à des fins d'études privées ou de recherche et seulement si la source est mentionnée.

Lieux géographiques
: Europe, Autriche, Belgique, République tchèque, France, Allemagne, Italie, Espagne

Mots-clés principaux
:
Accessibilité des soins et services
Soins de longue durée
Prestation des soins de santé
Critère d'admissibilité

Mots-clés secondaires : Clientèle vulnérable ; Perspective internationale

Résumé :

Although economic literature has recently started to concentrate on the design, the scope and the regulations of main public programmes of Long-Term-Care in Europe, no analysis have, so far, compared different systems in terms of their degree of inclusiveness with respe ct to vulnerable elderly's health status. Focusing on several European countries, this paper investigate how LTC regulations assess vulnerability, as well as how they define a minimum level of objective -dependency that would entitle
individuals to receive public benefits (in-kind or in-cash) for home-based care. Our contribution is threefold. We provide detailed information on assessment and eligibility frameworks for eleven LTC programmes in Europe. We show that substantial heterogeneities exist both at the extensive margin (the health-outcomes that are included in the vulnerability - assessment) and at the intensive margin (the minimum
vulnerability threshold that defines benefit eligibility) of the assessment strategies. Building on this information, we compare LTC programmes in terms of their degree of inclusiveness, i.e., we investigate the extent to which each programme is able to cover a standard population of elderly individuals facing functional and cognitive limitations. The comparison is performed following both a directly - and an indirectly - adjusted strategy using SHARE data.

Langue : Anglais
Doc n° : 31668 ISBN / ISSN : 1827-3580
NumRec : 6885003
 

       

  Copier Permanent URL de cette page Ajouter cette page

     

disponible
Réserver
Pour réserver ce document, vous devez d'abord vous connecter


Aller vers :   IUGM    Fondation IUGM   Centre de recherche IUGM